The ghost of the famous Russian scholar has resurfaced for the 21st Century to comment on the political issues of our time.

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Terms Of Endearment

Prime Minister Harper's announcement of fixed election dates and fixed Senate terms offered Canadians the usual mix of political compromise and irony. Ironic because Harper himself didn't think it worthy of a minority government to hold the House of Commons hostage with a threat of an election. Yet he made sure the debate on Afghanistan was reduced to 6 hours for the same reason, thereby scaring the heck out of the opposition who weren't interested in going to the polls so soon.

Clearly the Harper government is into cosmetic change rather than fundamental change in Canada's political system. Fundamental change would be proportional representation, but nobody in Ottawa wants to stick his or her neck out on that one. [except Jack Layton]. Proportional representation is far more indicative of a healthy democracy than fixed election dates, which only tie up our calendar. Besides, the marathon of politics, aka the Liberal Leadership race comes to a merciful end in December. It just wouldn't be fair to them. Besides I like the current system because it's always full of surprises. Can you imagine the time spent by the Federal parties raising money in between elections? Too many questionable partnerships if you ask me. [Maybe that's the real intention; election reform notwithstanding]

Meanwhile at the Senate, loyal Conservative party members are wondering whether a long-term commitment is in their future. I’m afraid that they’ll be disappointed. The Senate is Canada's answer to the country club where the rich retire to a life of privilege disguised as public service. [Where do I sign up?]

I like the notion of an 8 year term, but what about the process of appointment? That's where the change is required. It's the definition of patronage rampant in our political system, and a few other sectors in this country. Again, another cosmetic change for those who put value in such decisions. An elected Senate is the way to go, if you don't choose proportional representation and maintain the status quo as it is now for the House.

Eight year terms are good, but can you imagine an elected Senate with fixed terms? Perhaps that would be the best compromise of all and a Canadian one, too.

That's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home